Only a moron, someone who is sucking on the airport's teat or a scoundrel who will disingenuously push an agenda (can you say Atlanta Journal-Constitution?) would dispute the wisdom of transforming the city's biggest font of cronyism and corruption into financial relief for taxpayers.
The imminent calamity is well-known. A succession of administrations failed to smell the gazillions of gallons of yecky stuff seeping from Atlanta's sad sack sewage system. So, with federal guns pointed at the city, Mayor Shirley Franklin has the stinking job of cleaning up the mess. Now.
The cost, according to Franklin, is $3 billion to build a tunnel and then expand and upgrade the system. There's some question over whether alternative solutions -- or ones that, minus fancy tweaks, would appease the feds' demands -- could save a billion or so, but hell, it's only citizens' money. Franklin won't countenance other ideas on fixing the sewers, and with somewhat of a pout, dismisses such suggestions as drivel.
Just as she does with the idea of privatizing the airport. Pooh and double pooh on such blasphemies, sayeth our mayor (whose ex-husband and kids are attached, in the form of airport concessions, to that abovementioned airport teat).
Franklin seems absolutely discombobulated at the ... um, shall we say "unenthusiastic" response to her idea of trebling sewage fees over the next few years. OK, so such staggering increases could force poor families to choose between food and flushing. And, OK, so businesses might cut back employees to afford lavatory facilities. And, OK, other companies might decide to take a hike, saying (with eloquent double entendre), "Who needs this crap?" Despite all that, the mayor just can't figure out why people aren't jumping with joy at her plan. (Memo to Mayor Franklin: Folks are just darn tired of paying for waste, mismanagement and corruption at City Hall.)
Meanwhile, the state and federal governments have snubbed Franklin's request for aid. Rich white guys, such as Falcons owner/Metro Atlanta Chamber Chairman Arthur Blank, are urging the city to pass Franklin's fee increases. But, then, it's doubtful Blank and pals have to sweat about paying monthly utility bills. The sewage fee increases punish poor and middle-class residents, and are irrelevant to the wealthy.
A few honest souls -- those annoying anti-tax troublemakers and a couple of Republican state legislators -- have been trying to get heard, with decidedly little interest from Franklin and with utter disdain from The Daily Voice of the Corporate Establishment.
"All we're saying is that we should talk about the idea of privatization," says John Sherman, president of the Fulton County Taxpayers Association. "Let's get a few bids and see if it makes sense."
Such radical thinking! Whew!
Keep in mind that the thug calling the shots from behind the curtain is Delta Air Lines, which doesn't mind at all sticking it to the taxpayers. Neither does the AJC, especially when it's looking out for its boardroom brethren, such as Delta.
Last week, an AJC editorial lambasted the idea of privatization, telling us that most of the airport's $230 million in annual revenues already comes from private contracts -- implying (falsely) there's almost nothing left to contract out. (Memo to AJC: It's the whole airport management we're talking about, you dummies.) And the newspaper says -- without a whiff of proof or without even quoting a pet "authority" -- a private operator would have "to raise landing fees and gate rentals dramatically in order to generate any profit."
That, my friends, is a statement composed of the same stuff that flows through Atlanta's decrepit sewers. At the very least, the best that can be said is that the AJC is offering pure conjecture as fact. (The paper did provide 400 words of space to a privatization proponent, as if such a meager allocation of op-ed real estate was sufficient to discuss such a complicated subject.)
The ultimate deceit by the AJC, Franklin and other foes of privatization is the implication that something is unique at Hartsfield-Jackson, that somehow other airports don't have debt, bonds to pay the debt, private concessionaires, and the like. The truth, of course, is that almost all major airports have debts, bonds and private contractors. Atlanta's airfield is anything but unique, except in its top ranking in passenger travel.
So, what's happened at other airports? A mere 11 months ago, the Atlanta City Council had a visitor, Katherine Howard, from an Australian outfit called MacQuarie Airports. It's one of the private operators and, interestingly, it acquired Sydney's airport and put about $3 billion into the pockets of that city's citizens. The sale of three other Australian airports raised almost another $3 billion.
What did Howard tell Atlanta's leaders the privatization of Hartsfield-Jackson would mean for taxpayers? She calculated the city would reap $2.6 billion.